For some reason, after a long ago "Weekly WANT IT" post about scooters/mopeds, I never talked about my scooter obsession on Procrastinet. Which is odd, because it was a pretty consuming thing for a long time. And I never did an official post documenting the purchase of my scooter, a terrific 1999 Kymco People 50 (nicknamed "Kimmery" or just The Scootch). I got her for under $800 last November (which, as anyone who has looked for a decent used scooter on Craigslist will know, is a screaming deal), and she has been rock-solid reliable ever since, except for when I let her sit for three months over the dead of winter and she needed some gas treatment to get going again.
Last week, riding across the Brooklyn Bridge on my morning commute, she passed 20,000 km - still starts at the first press of the starter button, still runs strong under all conditions (including violent thunderstorms). No less a luminary in the Brooklyn scooter scene than Nick at Brooklynbretta whistled in amazement over her dependability with such high miles, saying that's why he loves Kymco scooters.
More even than the satisfaction of fulfilling a WANT IT, I really love having a scooter. Last Friday, it was raining in the morning and I took the subway, and spent the whole time grumbling to myself about what a drag it was compared to the independence and efficiency of travel by scooter.
So Saturday morning, I'm zipping over to EST for Youngblood interviews - a trip that takes 35 minutes on the scootch, versus most of an hour on the subway - and I turned on 23rd Street to head over to 10th Avenue. I was at the head of traffic, in the left of the two Westbound lanes. There was a blue Subaru Tribeca in the right lane, slowing down and pulling off to the right - apparently parking.
Except he wasn't parking - he was pulling right to make a U-Turn. Which he proceeded to do, right into my path, about three car lengths ahead of me.
Unfortunately, I was on a thirty-foot patch of wet pavement at the time. So when I jumped on the brakes to avoid hitting this jackass, the bike went immediately into a skid.
Usually in the past when hairy stuff has gone down, time has slowed and I've remembered everything in equisite detail. Not so this time. I remember the car swinging in front of me, grabbing the brakes, hearing and feeling the skid, hearing a bang as my scooter hit the deck, and then I was lying on 23rd Street staring at the bottom of my bike as it lay (still running) a few feet away. I guess hitting the deck at 25-30 miles an hour precludes careful observation of the event.
The Subaru stopped long enough for me to glare at him disbelievingly from the pavement, and then sped away. A car service guy behind me in my lane (who praise Jesus saw me go down and stopped fifteen feet back) asked if I needed an ambulance, and assuming that the pain in my hands and legs would be a lot worse if I was seriously hurt, I said "no." I took a deep breath, got to my feet, got the bike upright and off the road, and sat for a long while trying not to throw up.
I was, I discovered, more or less all right - I tore my new jeans (DAMNIT) and the knees underneath, and bruised the bejeesus out of my right hip. The scooter was scratched and a turn signal was broken, but otherwise all was well. Since then I've got a limp from my badly bruised and skinned left knee, and putting my socks on is a huge drag since I'm not thrilled about bending my left leg, but it's all more annoying than distressing.
Mostly, I was immediately sad. Sad because I knew, even while I was still debating it with myself, that my days as a Scooter Commuter were over.
Anyone who rides a motorcycle will tell you that you're going to go down at some point. That it's "the price of the ride." And honestly, if God came down and said "You can keep riding the scooter, but once a year some assclown is going to do something stupid and you're going to hit the deck and bang yourself up like that," I think I'd take that deal. Whatever. It's some bruises and a torn up knee.
But I don't have a deal like that. And next time, the car service guy might be closer behind me, and the idea of Max growing up with no Dad because Dad decided he just HAD to ride a scooter in Manhattan makes me sick, regardless of how long the odds actually are against it.
Which, as I've said, PISSES ME OFF because I really, really like riding that damn thing.
God damnit.
Posted by rjt at October 23, 2006 04:46 PMtake off the band-aid, and the skirt. put on your MAN pants and get back on the friggin scooter. A run-in with a shitty driver is going to happen in Manhattan; even if you're a pedestrian just about to hop on the safe and smelly subway. You're just as likely to get hit in a crosswalk, sprain your ankle descending those slippery subway station steps, or be stabbed by a vagrant.
At least on the scooter you could outrun the vagrant.
You're not going to be squished by a bus or struck down by the lords of traffic for tempting fate. The scooter works for you and it is yours, ride it.
"the idea of Max growing up with no Dad because Dad..." will keep inside forever if yer not willing to get back on the horse.
/begin pontification
Once again, Perj is talking out of his lower excretory orifice. Please do not for one second regret retiring the scootch from active Manhattan duty. Be grateful you have been allowed to make this choice. Judging from your description of your accident (one that I'm sure made everyone who reads this and knows you cringe), you almost had the choice made for you. You are absolutely correct that Max needs to have his Dad around more than you need to ride the scootch back and forth to work. And besides, this does not have to be a permanent hiatus. You never know, in 10 or 15 years, you may have that country house you long for, and I'll bet the roads near it won't be so crowded. Good call, RJ. As Michael Corleone once said, "It's the smart play". You always were the smart one.
/pontification over.
Posted by: Scotso the Lawbot at October 25, 2006 11:48 AM
Saddle your horse, partner. The sunset's a-comin no matter whether you split rail or huddle in the basement. Best to live in the brightest sunlight while you can.
"Saddle your own horse
Cull your own herd
Bury your own dead"
- Old Cowboy Saying
Posted by: frydry at October 25, 2006 04:03 PMScotso:
Thanks for the support!
Perj:
Nice try, Patton. I was actually pleased at your attempted bitchslap, because it had no effect at all which, in turn, made me realize how sure I am about the decision.
And besides, this skirt is fetching and highlights the pretty colors of the bruises-and-abrasions motif I have going on my knees...
Posted by: rjt at October 25, 2006 04:05 PMFrydry:
Your comment must have come in while I was writing mine, didn't mean to leave you out. Yours is certainly the most poetic of the advice, and without a doubt the one that, if I were a cowboy, I would take... But I am, alas, not a cowboy, but a mild-mannered Urb-Suburban middle class dad...
Posted by: rjt at October 25, 2006 04:07 PM/begin contrarian rant
oh please!
I was not trying to motivate you, you armchair psychiatrist, and I could not care a dink if you ever rode the scooter again. Imagine if you had worn, I don't know, kneepads, and been more alert. You'd have avoided the idiot with the U-turn, but would have been hit from behind by the other guy. Imagine you'd been in the VW, and no doubt been going faster, the collision would've been inevitable; certain grievous injury. Imagine if you had walked the streets, NO!, too horrible. Best to stay inside and send out missives about how your life is suddenly too dangerous. Best to lament the scratched scooter and new found limp, rather than ask yourself why you thought a souped up rider mower that travels just as low to the ground on wheelbarrow tires, but is NARROWER and unprotected by so much as a reasonable windscreen, would entitle you to speed with the flow of Manhattan traffic, where there are cars and trucks, and U-turning morons. So, I believe that, yes, a scooter is a stupid and dangerous thing to ride; you had better ride it again, you fop; of course Max needs his dad, but you didn't and you aren't gonna die, you sissy. Don't capitalize on your own fear while thumping your chest about it. And you better draw the shades, I hear too much sunlight will give you cancer.
And by the way, lawbot, way to suck up to the dad with responsibilites angle. I've been with you in your sportscar doing 100mph. Where was the pretentious monologue then, or were your swollen balls blocking your hypocrite maw?
I realize I have no actual point, so I will end here.
/end contrarian rant
For now, yes, rest.
And let me know if you want to sell the scoot.
-frydry
(currently riding subway to east village nightly to play the villain in a 19th century melodrama, which accounts for some of the simpleminded poesy.)
Posted by: frydry at October 25, 2006 05:31 PMPerj, you ignorant slut.
Way to rant incoherently while still maintaining the particularly piquant "responsibility is for losers" slant for which you have become justifiably famous.
Did I state, anywhere in my monograph, that once you have a child you should cease to take any and all risks that might conceivably result in death, dismemberment or disfigurement? I did not. Life is risk. The trick is figuring out which ones to take, and which ones are unnecessary. I was merely stating that I agree with RJ's conclusion that driving a scooter through rush hour, Manhattan traffic probably is an unnecessary risk.
And, for the record, we never hit 100 mph. However, even if we did, approaching that speed in a modern, well-maintained vehicle that is expressly built for the purpose of safely traveling at such speeds is not irresponsible or even dangerous, under the right conditions. Which were in effect at the time of the alleged speed-mongering. Please don't compare this to driving a scooter on a rain-slicked street in rush-hour Manhattan traffic. Do scooters have antilock brakes? Traction control? Airbags? Seatbelts? Four wheels wearing high performance tires? Engineered crumple zones and high strength alloy steel frames? Apples to apples, please.
The "dad-with-responsibilities angle", as you so aptly titled the theme of this particular post-fest, WAS THE WHOLE POINT OF RJ'S ORIGINAL POST. In my response, I was merely stating that I agreed with him, and that your attempt to impugn his manhood because of his conclusion was misguided, childish and immature. From your response, I can assume that my message was received.
So, in conclusion, shut your pie hole.
Posted by: scotso the lawbot at October 25, 2006 05:35 PMyou want apples to apples?
apple is to apple as man who delighted to be trapped in a room full of his own farts is to lawbot.
And yes, I stand corrected, we only got up to 95mph in your phallus mobile, and the conditions were perfectly safe, that's why you kept apologizing for hotdogging and offered to slow down. And it cornered like a pregnant cow.
And while you both lick each others hind quarters congratulating yourselves on the newly realized responsibilites of a dad, I'm at home fulfilling them, raising two kids by myself for most of the day, and then working some of the time. I don't have riches, but I am happy as a clam, and it is for that, that I have become so justifiably famous. I realize that it is your teeth grinding envy of this that has you constantly citing the Dad rulebook, reading all your self-written rules aloud, so that you can think yourself a hero, but man, you're just another schmuck with a 9 to 5, just like I'm only a schmuck with a part time job, and RJ's just a schmuck who won't ride a bike now because he probably never got life insurance when he became a dad.
See? Apples to apples to schmuck. New rule.
damn, still can't seem to make a point, but this is fun.
I shouldn't, but I just can't stop myself. Sigh.
Recognizing that at this point, we are probably the only two people who even care about our little exercise in rhetoric and discourse...
Wow. Hit a little close to a tender spot, I guess. You are defending yourself against an accusation that has not been made against you, sir. Never did I mean to state or even imply that you are not fulfilling your responsibilities as a father. Even admitting that I am, indeed, just another schmuck with a 9 to 5, how is that fact, or the fact that you stay at home and raise your children, even remotely relevant? I thought we were debating whether riding a scooter was an unnecessary risk. I did not realize we were also debating the relative merits of your chosen employment and lifestyle versus mine. That is not a debate I care to have, however. To each his own, and more power to you. I do not envy you because I do not envy anyone. It is a waste of time.
HOWEVER, since you did accuse me of hypocrisy in a prior post, I will accuse you of the same crime. Please do not ever ridicule my choice of big boy toys, unless you wish to shatter the windows of your particular glass house of hobbies by throwing such stones. You seem obsessed with my car. Yes, it is fast, and I do drive it that way. I do not do so unsafely or irresponsibly. It is not, nor has it ever been, a phallus replacement. If that were the case, I would have bought a Corvette. It is a toy, like a scooter, or a home entertainment system, or a staggering, Library-of-Congress-like collection of pornogr-er, guita-er, music. As I said, to each his own.
Because it seems to have escaped you to this point, allow me to restate: RJ decided that scooters are a little too dangerous for him these days. I agreed with that choice. You ridiculed it, ridiculed me for agreeing with it, and continue to do so, in the process determining that I have appointed myself the world's great arbiter of paternal responsiblity fulfillment. Nothing could be further from the truth. As Chris Rock once said, and I paraprhase, "so you're taking care of your kids, so what? What do you want, a cookie? You're supposed to take care of your kids!".
Your cookie will be in the mail tomorrow, sir. Chocolate chip, or oatmeal?
(and yes, this is a blast...too much fun. Nice to see that we still don't take ourselves to seriously)
Posted by: Scotso the Lawbot at October 25, 2006 08:03 PMOK BOYS
I can't imagine what your response would be if you actually gave birth to these children. But I digress.....
You have a choice as a dad (parent) you can be the Steve Irwin dad, the guy who made the choice of living each day to the fullest and taking constant risk and well sadly we know how that turned out. You can be the bubble dad, with kids who have no idea how to take risks. They live each day living in fear untii the one day someone tries something like, drinking coke with pop rocks and dies (I swear it happened) .
But maybe, just maybe, you could try to live in the middle, find a girl who will smack you in the head when you are being an ass, and allow you to have your toys and fun but remember this everything you do is an example to your kids, the good the bad and the risky. For one day they will throw it back in your face when you are trying to parent, WELL YOU HAD A ___________________ (insert risky item) and YOUR STILL ALIVE.
Good luck gentlemen your passion and chest thumping gives me hope for the next generation
I make this statement taking neither side, truth is I just think you both like to argue and use big words...............
Posted by: mrslawbot at October 26, 2006 09:33 AMExactly! "WELL YOU HAD A ___________________ (insert risky item) and YOUR STILL ALIVE"
This is my point (I think). WELL YOU HAD A scooter, um, no, a tall ladder, no? a pocket knife? Jeez dad didn't you have anything good? and YOUR STILL ALIVE. I think guys need a little something dangerous in their past, so they can look at their sons with a certain gravitas on their faces when they have to tell them to be careful. You need the experience there so you can look honest, so they'll have a chance of listening, but you can't do it in a skirt. So RJ could have the, Once I spilled my scooter, which was too dangerous to ride in the city anyway, but I got right back on it, and rode it more responsibly. Or he can have the, Once I fell off my scooter and I NEVER rode it again, but I did it for you. Max will say "pfff, that's gay! Jeez Dad!"
Whereas lawbot can say "yes, I had a sportscar, but I only went fast when it was safe, or when I wanted to impress my friends, but everyone knows I'm really a grownup, dammit! Oh, and I play video games to the point of detriment to my hygiene, but I'm still a grownup and you can't make fun of my toys. I'm an adult and don't touch my stuff." And lawbot junior still won't understand why he can't set off fireworks in the garage.
And I can say "get away from my porn, my cd's, and my guitars!! they're mine! didn't all that time we spent together teach you anything? Let me out of this house! I should have gone to law school." and my kids will slowly back away from me.
I do not disparage Lawbot's chosen career, or choice of toys, I merely tell him why I am "justifiably famous" for mine, and I use his as its greatest contrast. I like chocolate chip, by the way, if you can tear yourself away from WOW (which you run in the background of whatever lawyering you're doing, I know it) long enough to get down to a Mrs. Fields...
And to Mrs Lawbot, I love you dearly, but you should know, that any woman who tries to arbitrate between two guys who are showboating, eventually gets called a rude, rude name...and then it's on!
to rj, you should ride the scooter again.
Posted by: perj at October 26, 2006 10:47 AMI'm going to put myself in the way of all sorts of abuse, and actually address something substantive in Perj's retarded silverback ranting and grunting:
"but I got right back on it, and rode it more responsibly..."
...betrays a fundamental ignorance of what we're talking about here. The only thing that would have kept me out of the accident this weekend would have been, um, not being there. Or the pavement not being wet. Or the assclown in the Tribeca not pulling out in front of me. Notice how only one of those is actually under my control?
And to reach back to an earlier poo-flinging session:
"Imagine you'd been in the VW, and no doubt been going faster, the collision would've been inevitable; certain grievous injury."
None of this is true. The scooter is faster than car traffic; the VW can stop on wet pavement; even in the event of an accident, t-boning someone in a car with airbags at 30 mph would almost certainly not result in grievous injury.
I know it's irrelevent to actually make an argument when all you're doing is swinging your dick around, but I couldn't resist.
The argument, not your dick.
Nevermind.
Posted by: rjt at October 26, 2006 11:14 AM"I don't wanna go outside! It's scary. Where's my teddy bear?"
Can we just prevent that?
Posted by: perj at October 26, 2006 11:26 AMLeave my fucking teddy bear out of this or I'll bust you in the nuts.
Posted by: rjt at October 26, 2006 11:30 AMsee? now it got personal. now everything is ruined.
Posted by: perj at October 26, 2006 03:52 PMsince nobody is reading this one anymore, I would like to add that lawbot is a douchebag. and now i've had the last word.
Posted by: perj at November 2, 2006 09:05 AMNo, no you didn't. Because I can take the last word and then turn off comments. Like this.
Posted by: rjt at November 12, 2006 11:03 PM